Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


I was forwarded this screenshot and it just is living rent free in my head right now.

teilten dies erneut

Als Antwort auf Sophie Schmieg

teilten dies erneut

Als Antwort auf Sophie Schmieg

"Let's generate low quality random numbers about as fast as a grandma knitting socks using terra-watts of power in billion dollar data centers." - said no one ev... Oh wait.
Als Antwort auf Sophie Schmieg

there's also the noise introduced by the GPU scheduler doing the matrix multiplies in a different order which produces different results because float is not associative.

Surely they meant that... Right?...

But also probably that isn't true random either.

Als Antwort auf ask

@ask that noise would be considered true random noise, but I don't know how many bits it has. While float isn't associative, it's like "mostly" associative, so depending on the condition of the matrix, it should be fairly low.

In any case, if you wanted to use that noise for cryptographic purposes, you'd first have to debias it by running it through a DRBG, and at that point you could just harvest it directly from the GPU for higher quality and performance.

Or query your stupid hardware RNG that literally every modern CPU has built-in.

@ask
Als Antwort auf Sophie Schmieg

@ask My bad if I have missed part of this thread - what you say is 100% accurate except nobody is using genAI random numbers for cryptographic or security purposes? Who is saying that? What?
@ask