Reading scientific reports about Monero's environmental impact.
If anyone knows any further about this, I'm open for an unbiased talk about this topic, I would like to learn more.
Reading scientific reports about Monero's environmental impact.
If anyone knows any further about this, I'm open for an unbiased talk about this topic, I would like to learn more.
Kevin Karhan
Als Antwort auf Voxel • • •like all #PoW #Cryptocurrency, #Monero too does #WastefulComputing.
That being said Monero was explicitly designed to not be #ASIC-able in a cost-efficient manner and be #GPU-unfriendly, so it's more #decentralized and doesn't cause harm by demanding custom hardware that can't be repurposed that causes 100% avoidable #eWaste!
stig atle
Als Antwort auf Voxel • • •Kevin Karhan
Als Antwort auf stig atle • • •@stigatle +1
Cuz #eWaste of #ADIC|s is a huge problem.
infosec.space/@kkarhan/1146386…
Kevin Karhan
2025-06-06 21:57:51
Howard Chu @ Symas
Als Antwort auf Voxel • • •Voxel
Als Antwort auf Howard Chu @ Symas • • •@hyc Sure, currently just collected and skim over them some are paywalled sadly.
In some Monero is just mentioned once or grouped together with other PoW coins
mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/4/218
researchgate.net/figure/The-ca…
nature.com/articles/s41598-022…
nature.com/articles/s41893-018…
oecd.org/en/publications/envir…
news.unm.edu/news/the-environm…
Can't guarantee any accuracy or trustworthiness of the linked articles, I've just collected for now.
Economic estimation of Bitcoin mining’s climate damages demonstrates closer resemblance to digital crude than digital gold - Scientific Reports
NatureHoward Chu @ Symas
Als Antwort auf Voxel • • •Voxel
Als Antwort auf Howard Chu @ Symas • • •@hyc Well, as far as I'm aware PoS is still much more environment-friendly than PoW. And there are other validation methods which I sadly have no further information on.
There might be reasons why you might want to prefer PoW over PoS, but with the current information I got the energy "waste" of PoW validation seems unnecessary. Have to dig deeper to tell for sure.
I'm currently trying to figure out mostly for personal reasons if I'll make use of Monero or not, with all its Pro's and Con's. And environmental impact is definitely not something I'll ignore, how great Monero might in other categories be.
Howard Chu @ Symas
Als Antwort auf Voxel • • •Kevin Karhan
Als Antwort auf Howard Chu @ Symas • • •also #PoS inherently rewards rich users and concentrates power even more than the nature of #PoW would, as running a #Monero #node or #miner doesn't require expensive custom #ASIC|s that are going to become manufactured #eWaste down the line and can't be repurposed for anything but being the noisiest and most expesive space heaters!
infosec.space/@kkarhan/1146386…
- Or to put it into perspective: PoS implementations like #Ethereum only rewarded already abdurdly rich capital holders and wiped everyone else out due to
... mehr anzeigenalso #PoS inherently rewards rich users and concentrates power even more than the nature of #PoW would, as running a #Monero #node or #miner doesn't require expensive custom #ASIC|s that are going to become manufactured #eWaste down the line and can't be repurposed for anything but being the noisiest and most expesive space heaters!
infosec.space/@kkarhan/1146386…
Case in point: There are only ugly and filthy solutions to that problem and Monero chose the "least worst" they could: Shure it still has problems but those are at least fully known, understood and working as in 'communities can outnumber single rich entities'...
Kevin Karhan
2025-06-06 21:57:51
Aron Fischer
Als Antwort auf Kevin Karhan • • •@kkarhan
PoS in Ethereum has similar returns on capital as other investments. Currently 2-3% per year. It scales with demand - there is a market mechanism at play.
Claiming that PoS inherently concentrates power in the wealthy misses the point - it mirrors the wider financial market which, yes, benefits the already wealthy.
This is a more fundamental problem that must be solved elsewhere.
And though a single validator is limited to 32 Eth minimum, pooled staking makes these 2%
@hyc @voxel
Kevin Karhan
Als Antwort auf Aron Fischer • • •@cobordism @hyc no, #ProfOfStake does concentrate wealth by virtue of having a minimum cap to allow for participation.
With #ProofOfWork there is at least no minimum #hashrate to participate and participating in a #pool dies not necessitate to trust someone with funds.
- OFC I don't deny that #PoW (like #
... mehr anzeigen@cobordism @hyc no, #ProfOfStake does concentrate wealth by virtue of having a minimum cap to allow for participation.
With #ProofOfWork there is at least no minimum #hashrate to participate and participating in a #pool dies not necessitate to trust someone with funds.
infosec.space/@kkarhan/1146386…
Kevin Karhan
2025-06-06 21:57:51
Aron Fischer
Als Antwort auf Aron Fischer • • •...returns available to anyone, just as anyone can invest in stock funds. That alone doesn't make things "fair". Our markets, taxes, regulations still favour the wealthy.
PoW is also a capital intensive business and with more capital you can achieve higher returns due to economies of scale.
Ultimately these are fundamental issues with capitalist markets refracted through the lens of cryptocurrency generation and distribution.
Inequality will not be solved here.
@hyc @voxel @kkarhan
Kevin Karhan
Als Antwort auf Aron Fischer • • •Noone claims that #Monero will help "#AbolishCapitalism"!
What is however evident is that only #PostPrivacy #Shitcoins can do #ProofOfStake as unlike #ProofOfWork it inherently necessitates #PostPrivacy as in all transactions and amounts are public.
Again: I call it "least worst" for a reason; not "great", "good" or even "okay"...
Howard Chu @ Symas
2025-06-06 20:38:03
Kevin Karhan
Als Antwort auf Kevin Karhan • • •@cobordism @hyc IMHO the only thing that moving #Ethereum from #PoW to #PoS achieved is raising the wall to make it harder, more expensive amd less attractive for #SmallInvestors to fiddle with it.
Demondtrably, #EthereumClassic would at least be more trustworthy, alas that's an Opinion based off 'vibes'…
Aron Fischer
Als Antwort auf Kevin Karhan • • •@kkarhan
"Whether the PoS transition did save energy is debateable since #Ethereum uses #ASIC|s"
can I have some of what you are smoking? Must be strong stuff :D
@hyc @voxel
Kevin Karhan
Als Antwort auf Aron Fischer • • •@cobordism @hyc It's called #mathematics, because #ASIC|s are simply manufactured #eWaste by virtue of being non-reuseable nor upcycle-able.
Your reply indicates that you ain't aware of fundamentals like what an ASIC is, that producing ICs is inherently bad for the envoirment and that these are just bad per concept, thus you've disqualified yourself with the saneist reply from any discussion.
#thxbye #EOD #next #muted
Aron Fischer
2025-06-07 12:32:19